5月29日亚太雅思大作文7分范文:孩子几岁上学更合适

2021-06-02 16:04:10来源:网络作者: 素素阅读量:

  5月29日亚太雅思大作文7分范文:孩子几岁上学更合适,这是一道双边讨论类话题,讨论的是孩子上学年龄的问题。最近三胎政策开放引发了许多讨论,其中非常重要的一件事情就是关于教育成本的问题,这道雅思题目讨论的“孩子上学年龄的问题”其实也是其中的一类。所以大家要明白,雅思考题真的是非常贴近时事,多读书多看报,对写作会有很大帮助。

  高分范文示例

  I would discuss in this essay why neither of the two views is persuasive enough, and I certainly agree that there should be a minimum age for the school access but it should not be always that fixed.

  The suggestion that children should go to school as soon as possible would sound not so doable because of its ambiguity. It sounds reasonable that children are allowed to go to school when they are ready to accept rudimentary education mentally and physically, and that is why people think they are supposed to enjoy their study life “as soon as possible”. Whereas the only problem is that no one can define a system of differentiation towards this. Just what type of personal condition is “possible” enough to go to school? The quantification fails to be set up because of the obscurity of this definition. It is true that one could be testified with related examining system to ensure whether he or she is qualified enough to be injected with school knowledge and whether one has the basic logic thinking, but the related measurements can never be that sound to guarantee such kids can always focus on their schooling if put in primary education when they are too young, or even more severe, they would not deprived of their freedom in their early childhood and this would not be harmful to their future. If so, that is certainly not “possible”, and the potential hazards would be certainly hidden if the children were truly sent to school too soon.

5月29日亚太雅思大作文7分范文:孩子几岁上学更合适
图片来源网络

  The concern elicited above lead to why some consider the regulation of setting up a minimum age limit for children to go to school, but it, actually, should not be implemented too absolutely to be always seven. I have never doubted this restriction of age may have been examined by experts or anthropologists and it seems to be somewhat the most scientific period to provide most infants with elementary education since they may be mature enough to get access. However, would it be too strict a rule for the entire world to obey without including the consideration towards, say, the concrete contents of different types of education, or other tangible conditions of the next generations in specific locations? What the policy has failed to be practical is that it just has fixed the minimum age of students, but not unified the education modes or other related standards at the same time:rules could certainly be relaxed if the first-step education in a country is relatively easy involving mostly the playful elements that are suitable even if the education receivers are much younger; sometimes the limitation has to be more rigorous when children are inculcated with things that are above-average difficult.

  In conclusion, I would agree that related criteria should indeed be given on what age is the best timing for schooling, but must be well-rounded enough by considering as many determinants as we can.

  相关词汇和语法结构

  Persuasive 有说服力的

  Minimum age 最低年龄

  Doable 可行的

  Ambiguity 模糊的

  Rigorous 严格的

  Inculcate 灌输

相关文章

热门文章