雅思大作文【政府类话题】高分范文及名师点评分享！

　　雅思写作备考时学生可以多看看一些高分范文，多背一些好的写作范文，有输入在输出时才能比较流畅，才能写出好的文章，下面我们一起来看看雅思大作文【政府类话题】高分范文及名师点评，烤鸭参考：

图片来源网络

　　领取更多雅思备考资料或口语题库(9-12月雅思口语题库+高分答案pdf)，欢迎大家在线联系客服老师咨询领取方式!

　　题目

　　Some people believe that governments should spend money on measures lo save languages with few speakers. However others believe that it is a waste of financial resource. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.(20171104)

　　范文

　　Some of the languages used by minority groups could face extinction in the near future. So people claim that the government should spend money in saving these languages from dying out but others believe it is a waste of public financia resources.

　　It is often said that to preserve a language is to preserve a culture. This is mainly because language s the carrier of culture. It is not only a tool for communication, but it is also part of the local people and their culture. When a language used by few people dies out, the culture connected to this language will disappear as well. For example, songs calligraphy, traditional customs and habits inherited by minority groups will also be lost. Evidently, when a language becomes obsolete, the culture too will fade away.

　　However, I suggest that even if the government heavily invested in saving languages that were dying out, it could still end up being quite fruitless. First, the real cause of a language dying out is its incompatibility with the development of the society and the economy. Undoubtedly, this is also the rule of history and civilisation. The conventional way of saving a language is to collect enough samples of this languages, by collecting written characters and recordings. It will then be studied and promoted by institutions, such as at some universities where the language can become an official course and be taught and studied. Since people will not have an opportunity to use this language in real life, it will eventually and inevita tably be filed away in the museum's archives.

　　In summary, as well being important for the anguage itself, the protection of a language is also mportant to both culture and history. However, the govemment's capital investment is not quite often counterbalanced with the natural development of the society, and for this reason I do not support the government spending too much public funding to protect a language.

　　一些少数群体所使用的语言在不久的将来可能面临着灭绝。有的人声称政府应该花钱救这些语言，使其免于又绝，然而，有的人则认为这是浪费公共对政资源。

　　人们常说，保护一门语言就是保护一种文化。这主要是因为语言是文化的载体。一门语言不只是沟通交流的工具，还是当地人和当地文化的一部分。当一种只有少数人使用的语言消失的时候，与其相关的文化也会消失，如这些少数群体所创作的歌曲、文字、传统风俗和习惯等。显然，没人使用这门语言，相关文化就会消失。

　　然而，我认为即使政府大力投资去拯这些即将消失的语言，也不一定会有效果。首先，一门语言之所以会灭绝，其根本原因就是不适应社会和经济的发展，毫无疑问，这也是历史和文明的必然规律。拯救一门语言的传统方法就是通过收集该语言的文字和录音来采集足够的样本，然后再由机构进行研究和推广，如在一些大学中使该语言成为教、学的正式课程。因为在现实生活中缺少使用这门语言的机会，所以最终它将不可避免地被收藏在博物馆的陈列室里。

　　总之，保护一门语言不仅对语言本身很重要，而且对文化和历史也同样重要。但是，政府的资金投入往往不能与社会的自然发展抗衡，因此，我不支持政府花费大量的公共资金去保护一门语言。

　　名师点评

　　这篇文章采用了“平衡”式写法。主一段主要论证题目中的观点一;主二段主要论证题目中的观点二;结尾段阐明作者的观点。

　　本题的问题是 discuss both these views and give your own opinion，本文很好地回答了这个问题。

　　必须承认，这种框架对于绝大部分考生而言是最容易仿写的写作框架之一。