雅思双边讨论类大作文教育类话题 孩子应该尽早上学 7分范文分析

　　雅思双边讨论类大作文教育类话题 孩子应该尽早上学 7分范文分析 大家遇到类似的话题如何写作呢？你是怎么理解的呢？如何分析？本文小编带大家一起来讨论这个问题，希望能帮到大家！

　　Nowadays some people say that children should go to school as young as possible. While others believe that children should go to school when they are at least seven years old. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. (题目来源：2019年12月14日亚太雅思大作文)

图片来源网络

　　1、题目大意

　　有人认为孩子应该尽可能早的上学，而其他人认为孩子应该至少七岁以上才能上学讨论双方观点并给与你个人观点.

　　2、写作思路

　　两种观点均缺乏合理性。

　　第一种观点的不合理在于我们没有办法定性什么样的学生情况可以被认定为是“尽可能早”。“可能”这个概念太过模糊，即便相关的体系测试系统能够检测出孩子是否已经心智成熟到可以接受教育，也无法准确检测他们是否可能在入学后长期专注，或者是过早接受教育会不会由于对他们童年时期自由度的过多限制而对未来产生影响。

　　虽然这意味着孩子应该被给与一个上学的年龄限制，但是这个限制也不应该太绝对。科学家和人类学家可能给予了一个很科学的7岁后上学的建议，但这个建议不应该是一个特别固定的状态，因为它并没有涵盖对于不同地区孩子的具体情况，以及孩子在特定地区所获得教育的具体内容。因而，固定的入学年龄应该在考量到这些决定因素后来被具体制定，可以略早也可以略晚。

　　3、提纲

　　4、高分范文

　　I would discuss in this essay why neither of the two views is persuasive enough, and I certainly agree that there should be a minimum age for the school access but it should not be always that fixed.

　　The suggestion that children should go to school as soon as possible would sound not so doable because of its ambiguity. It sounds reasonable that children are allowed to go to school when they are ready to accept rudimentary education mentally and physically, and that is why people think they are supposed to enjoy their study life “as soon as possible”. Whereas the only problem is that no one can define a system of differentiation towards this. Just what type of personal condition is “possible” enough to go to school? The quantification fails to be set up because of the obscurity of this definition. It is true that one could be testified with related examining system to ensure whether he or she is qualified enough to be injected with school knowledge and whether one has the basic logic thinking, but the related measurements can never be that sound to guarantee such kids can always focus on their schooling if put in primary education when they are too young, or even more severe, they would not deprived of their freedom in their early childhood and this would not be harmful to their future. If so, that is certainly not “possible”, and the potential hazards would be certainly hidden if the children were truly sent to school too soon.

　　The concern elicited above lead to why some consider the regulation of setting up a minimum age limit for children to go to school, but it, actually, should not be implemented too absolutely to be always seven. I have never doubted this restriction of age may have been examined by experts or anthropologists and it seems to be somewhat the most scientific period to provide most infants with elementary education since they may be mature enough to get access. However, would it be too strict a rule for the entire world to obey without including the consideration towards, say, the concrete contents of different types of education, or other tangible conditions of the next generations in specific locations? What the policy has failed to be practical is that it just has fixed the minimum age of students, but not unified the education modes or other related standards at the same time：rules could certainly be relaxed if the first-step education in a country is relatively easy involving mostly the playful elements that are suitable even if the education receivers are much younger; sometimes the limitation has to be more rigorous when children are inculcated with things that are above-average difficult.

　　In conclusion, I would agree that related criteria should indeed be given on what age is the best timing for schooling, but must be well-rounded enough by considering as many determinants as we can.

　　5、相关词汇

　　Persuasive 有说服力的

　　Minimum age 最低年龄

　　Doable 可行的

　　Ambiguity 模糊的

　　Rigorous 严格的

　　Inculcate 灌输